The planning committee for the IHSLA 2007 will be meeting very soon. Lorna Springston and her staff compiled the survey results below from our meeting in April. Please feel free to contacy myself crbishop@ecommunity.com or contact Patty Lunsford--with further suggestions, input and ideas.
PUBLIC HEALTH IS CONTAGIOUS -
SPREADING THE WORD
ANNUAL MEETING April 27-28, 2006
Muncie, Indiana
Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following aspects of the conference.
I Acquired
Please continue evaluation on back!
Agree SomewhatAgree Somewhat Disagree N/A
Knowledge & skills I can use 17 (85%) 2 (10%) 1
Program Content Was well organized
19 (95%) 1 (5%)
Was relevant to my needs 17 (85%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%)
Speaker was Knowledgeable
Kris Alpi, MLS, MPH 18 (90%) 2 (10%)
Peggy Richwine, MS, MLS 19 (9 5%) 1 (5%)
Terrie Fenner, EBSCO 16(80%) 2(10%) 2(10%)
Suzanne Braun-McGee, MLS 19 (95%) 1 (5%)
Presentation was Relevant/Useful
Evidence-Based Public Health:
Finding & Appraising Relevant 18 (90%) 2 (10%)
Resources
Structure of Indiana Public 17 (85%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%)
Link Resolvers 15 (75%) 3 (15%) 2 (10%)
Blogging Basics 17 (85%) 3 (15%)
Accommodations/Settings
Very Good Good Fair Poor N/A
Conference Room 15 (75%) 5 (25%)
Food Quality 13 (65%) 6 (30%) 1 (5%)
Guest Rooms/Amenities 10 (50%) 4(20%) 1 (5%) 5 (25%)
Accessibility 13 (65%) 6 (3 0%) 1 (5%)
Exhibitors were essential:
Agree: 14 (70%) Somewhat Agree: 2 (10%) Somewhat Disagree: 1 (5%)
Disagree: 0 (0%) No Response : 3 (15%)
Exhibitors were essential because:
• Face to face meeting; financial support.
• Sponsorship.
• So much to learn, absorb, & share with our hospitals/staffs/administrations & patrons.
• New products & resources; chance to talk face to face.
• I have very little power over which vendors we use at my library but I do like to know as much about them as possible.
• They make meetings possible.
Overall, I felt this meeting was:
Excellent: 13 (65%) Above Average: 4 (20%) Average: 0 (0%)
Below Average: 0 (0%) No Response: 3 (15%)
Suggestions for future topics:
• Measuring impact of services, developing outreach programs, effective teaching methods.
• Library management/budget/communications — especially with our patrons (physicians).
• 20-3 0 for individual to describe (announce) grants proposals, recent grant acquisitions, innovations in library management (i.e. what new things have we tried), job market/changes. Basically, time for open participation for librarians to share with each other (different from lunch, which is casual; something a little more formal giving merit to librarian’s contributions).
• Business resources from business librarians; grant writing.
• Virtual libraries & services.
• RSSR newsreaders; collaborative technologies-blogs, wikis; view of the library/health sciences library; a health professional in their 20’s who likes & uses technology.
• Consumer health track; assessment track; assessing various programs.
Other comments:
• Public health is not currently a focus of my organization, so not all was applicable. But overall, enjoyable and useful for networking.
• Very nice job!
• Start time too early. This group puts together the nicest bags—thanks!
• Put links to all presentations on website.
• This entire conference has been extraordinary inspiring, exciting and wonderful in every aspect. Thank you so much!
• Very good meeting! Thank you!
• Thanks again!
• Lovely meeting — great food. Enjoyed the program.
• Very enjoyable meeting; great hospitality & solid meeting content
• Very good meeting; program provided excellent content, and networking with colleagues is always a plus.